Al, U are speaking of SSA (scratch scoring average). This is usually inaccurate due to the fact SSA is only calculated during large events for the Open division, where the best players in the world are competing. Par should be calculated according to what an average disc golfer scores on a hole. Average is kind of a hard term to define, I guess it would be an Am II disc golfer. If a hole averages 3.5 - 4.0 than it would be a par 4, I feel it should be rounded up to the next whole #, since U can't 1/2 or 1/4 throw. But I do agree that some holes are "tweeners", they are in between number values...... like #13 at Fallasburg..It's kind of a 3.5.. hard to 2, 3 is a good score, but 4s happen
Al, U are speaking of SSA (scratch scoring average). This is usually inaccurate due to the fact SSA is only calculated during large events for the Open division, where the best players in the world are competing. Par should be calculated according to what an average disc golfer scores on a hole. Average is kind of a hard term to define, I guess it would be an Am II disc golfer. If a hole averages 3.5 - 4.0 than it would be a par 4, I feel it should be rounded up to the next whole #, since U can't 1/2 or 1/4 throw. But I do agree that some holes are "tweeners", they are in between number values...... like #13 at Fallasburg..It's kind of a 3.5.. hard to 2, 3 is a good score, but 4s happen