Positives for the proposed holes- Challenging, better use of trees, use of changing elevation, much better course flow as there is no walking from 11 to 12.
Weakness for proposed holes- Agree with ...
show more ›
Positives for the proposed holes- Challenging, better use of trees, use of changing elevation, much better course flow as there is no walking from 11 to 12.
Weakness for proposed holes- Agree with jon and rick on #11 throwing blind into walking trail is an accident waiting to happen (unfortunately as you guys are working so hard for support for disc golf I would hate to see it be lost because of a preventable accident), My group had two of four players end up in fair way of 13 on no. 12 with their second shot (more inexperienced players had trouble).
Suggestions- I like Jon's Idea of moving T box up on 11 so you can see the walking path while you drive, or consider moving t box tee box to a location where you can see the pin. I love the placement of the pin, it is protected but not so protected that you don't think you can get there (only problem with this is that the hole is almost a carbon copy of no. 6). On No. 11 I would move pin to a place that would not interfere with 13... possible right in front of or to the west of the trees... that way it still has protection if you try to make and ace run and get in the thick tree. Anyway you guy are definetly on the right path to making some improvements on this course.
