It is hard to tell after 1 week of A / B pools using averages but here is a look at the numbers as they fell for those who are interested.
To run the A / B pools we had to move some B pools into the ...
show more ›
It is hard to tell after 1 week of A / B pools using averages but here is a look at the numbers as they fell for those who are interested.
To run the A / B pools we had to move some B pools into the A pool and of course the C Pool players got moved up to the remaining B pool. This meant that there was a possibility of a B pool player getting matched up with a C Pool player. Of course that happened.
We had 43 players meaning there were 22 in the A pool and 21 in the B Pool.
21 players were matched up and an A pool player was Cali. We were not about to negatively handicap a C Pool player with Cali.
Looking at last night's results, I think kids still eating alphabet soup could have predicted this outcome ;-)
There were 11 teams made up with AB players / half of those who registered.
They won 26 of the 44 games played for a winning percentage of 59.1%
A real shocker here. The more talented AB pool team won more than the AC, BB, and BC pool teams combined.
There were 7 teams made up with AC players / 31.85% of those who registered.
They won 9 of the 44 games played for a winning percentage of 20.4%
There were 3 teams made up with BB (1 of them was Ted who was Cali) / 13.6% of those who registered.
They won 8 of the 44 games played for a winning percentage of 18.2%
There was one BC team or 4.6% of those who registered.
The BC team won 1 game for a winning pecentage of 2.3%
For the past few weeks we have used the averages and only a few people have moved division from when we were picking the divisions based off of reputation. Averages have helped make the process much simpler. Thank you Ken Mango for taking the initiative for creating and maintaing the averages.
