Pittsford Recreation Park

Pittsford, Vermont     1 course · 18 holes     Driving directions

Course reviews

Sign In or Sign Up to review this course.
Most votes   |   Newest first   |   Oldest first
-  +1 votes  + tony freson › November 27, 2010
Although this is a bit of a shorter course, it is through a beautiful section of woods. 30 is par, and holes can eat you up if you are not an accurate mid-range thrower. There is a back nine going in right now and should be ready in early summer. Two sets of tees make it fun for any level player. Everyone I have talked to about this course has really loved it.
-  +0 votes  + Mike McFarlin › December 27, 2010
Nice course in the woods, and most of the tee boxes are filled wood chips. However, a few tees are very slick when wet. Good course to play if you like using your midranges.
-  +0 votes  + Ryan McFarlin › April 4, 2013
-  +0 votes  + Andrew M › April 26, 2012
This course is now 18 different holes. Most are tightly wooded, with only a few open holes. The designers did a nice job working the elevation changes. Some holes lack a fareway, but you can still slip a shot through the trees most times.
-  +0 votes  + Tyler S › December 17, 2015
Wonderful mid-range course. Creative layouts, two tee-pads per hole.
-  +0 votes  + Cory Barron › May 15, 2024
-  +0 votes  + Owen W › May 8, 2017
bring a towel
-  +0 votes  + Bogey Griplock › April 18, 2017
-  +0 votes  + Chauncey Germain › June 6, 2020
-  +0 votes  + Jason Ellison › July 2, 2019
Love the course. Typical Vermont woods. There are a lot of springs in the early summer making it pretty wet, but come July it starts drying out. The Tee boxes are sure pac now rather than wood chips. Love the course. Especially for the price. And for it being nearly all volunteer created, and cared for I think it is pretty darn good! Would have rated it higher, but the early season wetness kind of stinks. Not much anyone can do about that though. It is Vermont after all!
-  +0 votes  + Robert W. › July 28, 2020
Access rd. was closed...sort of ..was I the only out-of-stater not to ignore it?
We use cookies to improve user experience.