Yea no 9/10 with that much ink and thrown a few rounds....Field tested with almost no sign of any wear or throwing evidence is a 9/10 collector, if it were a stock disc I might give it to ya
Your right typically a disc with ink on it I would never rate a 9/10. However, this disc is over 24 years old with an intact stamp no scratches or nics the only blemish is the ink on the back. So I'm gonna rate it 9/10 just this one time.
Ink affects condition, its been marked up.....its value is diminished. He is stating its not a thrower so the condition AND ink are important and determine both the rating and value. To say that ink has not dimished this disc is down right wrong. Its either a collector (subject to collector ratings, ...
more
Ink affects condition, its been marked up.....its value is diminished. He is stating its not a thrower so the condition AND ink are important and determine both the rating and value. To say that ink has not dimished this disc is down right wrong. Its either a collector (subject to collector ratings, where INK does matter) or its a thrower and its not subject to that but dont use the qualifyer its "24 yrs old", as this is an adjective to describe the collectibility.
The huge ink blot on the back makes it 8/10 at best 9/10 has no ink. Are you looking for any trades?
sold
Yea no 9/10 with that much ink and thrown a few rounds....Field tested with almost no sign of any wear or throwing evidence is a 9/10 collector, if it were a stock disc I might give it to ya
Your right typically a disc with ink on it I would never rate a 9/10. However, this disc is over 24 years old with an intact stamp no scratches or nics the only blemish is the ink on the back. So I'm gonna rate it 9/10 just this one time.
Condition and ink are 2 separate things. This guy's discs are always as advertised
Ink affects condition, its been marked up.....its value is diminished. He is stating its not a thrower so the condition AND ink are important and determine both the rating and value. To say that ink has not dimished this disc is down right wrong. Its either a collector (subject to collector ratings, ... more
Ink affects condition, its been marked up.....its value is diminished. He is stating its not a thrower so the condition AND ink are important and determine both the rating and value. To say that ink has not dimished this disc is down right wrong. Its either a collector (subject to collector ratings, where INK does matter) or its a thrower and its not subject to that but dont use the qualifyer its "24 yrs old", as this is an adjective to describe the collectibility.
Personally Id describe it as a collector, "8/10 DUE to ink, with out the ink this disc would be an 9/10
but to each thier own and good luck!
I agree Wade, ink does effect value, just different than condition to me. I see your point on collector ratings though. Still a good seller for sure.
A disc like t his needs to be thrown no amount of ink can affect it's flight.