Silver Creek Recreational Area

Harvey, Michigan     1 course · 18 holes     Driving directions

Course reviews

Log In or Sign Up to review this course.
Most votes   |   Newest first   |   Oldest first
-  +6 votes  + Kevin Gillhespy › May 26, 2017
C+
Needs concrete teepad's
-  +5 votes  + Tim Kopacz › August 1, 2016
B-
After playing on the MPO lead card at the Double Bounty event, its evident that the lines arent as smooth and clean here off the tees. We'll work with the township to do some select cutting and smooth out the flight paths and clean up small and dead trees to open things up.
-  +4 votes  + Walker Rowe › May 31, 2012
B
-  +2 votes  + Jeremy Moran › January 8, 2014
A-
New 18 hole layout with long and short tees!
-  +2 votes  + Phil Britton › August 25, 2017
A+
My home course. The new concrete pads and the course work several people have been doing have made this course really nice. Shots are tight and varied. Different pin locations can drastically change the way this course plays from round to round.
-  +1 votes  + bud depetro › June 3, 2012
A-
definetly a better layout and more challenging than old course.
-  +1 votes  + Nate Simpson › March 9, 2015
B-
-  +1 votes  + Sebastian Hohl › July 6, 2012
B+
-  +1 votes  + DJ Metzer › September 15, 2012
B
Decent little 9 holer...only real negative is the lack of tee pads. Short little course great for beginners.
-  +1 votes  + Cory J › September 17, 2012
B
Gradually has gotten better since first made. Once you play the course a couple times, you get use to avoiding the trees. The new signs are a nice touch and the maintenance has been great. I hope this course doesn't disappear when the Marquette course is put up.
-  +1 votes  + Ryan Vincent › September 7, 2014
B+
-  +1 votes  + David Spilling › August 12, 2014
A-
Shorter than Powder Mill, but more technical. Low ceilings, narrow fairways, and a few risky greens demanding accuracy.
-  +1 votes  + Jeff Schettner › September 27, 2014
B+
-  +1 votes  + Parker Smith › July 19, 2015
A-
Some very technical shots, but all are reachable. Steer clear of the trees and you should be good!
-  +1 votes  + Andrew Jones › June 8, 2016
B
-  +1 votes  + Jeremy Wright › October 23, 2015
B
-  +0 votes  + Becky Gilbert › July 16, 2016
B-
-  +0 votes  + Shane Flattery › June 9, 2015
B+
-  +0 votes  + Bart Kowalewski › December 28, 2016
B
-  +0 votes  + Ryan Wille › June 23, 2016
B+
Nice wooded hole. really tight lines make you have throw perfect on most holes. If there was just little more room for error I think this course would be much better. But still a nice course and would suggest giving it a try. I'll be back.
-  +0 votes  + Kennan Johnson › June 21, 2015
B+
-  +0 votes  + Tab dab › May 7, 2017
A-
-  +0 votes  + Joseph Rogers › September 12, 2017
B+
-  -1 votes  + Brian WPD Frawley › August 12, 2016
B
-  -1 votes  + Greg Argyle › August 31, 2016
B-
-  -1 votes  + Jake Nease › May 29, 2017
D-
Neeeds new teepads now... break you ankle or twist it on every one... they all have about a 4 gallon puddle in them
-  -1 votes  + casey simmons › June 13, 2012
A
love the the course. every hole has its own little(sometimes big) challenge.
-  -1 votes  + Erin Feeley › October 16, 2015
B
Politics am I right.
-  -1 votes  + Jack Bungart › July 2, 2017
C
The tee pads had deep holes in them and were a bit treacherous. The course was pretty technical but very short. Nothing special but worth playing.
-  -1 votes  + Trent Smith › August 31, 2016
C+
-  -1 votes  + Mark Nowicki › July 12, 2017
B-
Not a bad course. Had to learn the layout and it's poorly marked, but aside from that I like it overall now that I got a round in out there.
-  -2 votes  + Chris Johnson › October 31, 2014
A
For a noob like me, it was a really fun course. The signage could be a lot better for the back 9 - took me a while to go from hole 9 to 10 (I think it was those holes...it was a couple of months ago).
-  -2 votes  + Mr. Dover › October 30, 2014
A+
-  -3 votes  + Jamie Vincent › May 13, 2015
A-
-  -4 votes  + Christian Waterman › February 27, 2016
A