Oakwood Lake Park

Oxford, Michigan     1 course · 18 holes     Driving directions

Course reviews

Sign In or Sign Up to review this course.
Most votes   |   Newest first   |   Oldest first
-  +5 votes  + Tom WagnerDogmans Den › June 27, 2024
A-
A beautiful heavily wooded short technical course. The course is currently in it’s best condition ever. Fairways have been trimmed and are mowed regularly. Cement pads (on the short side) are on all holes except #2. Older ChainStar baskets have glow tape on them. There is a nice option to play hole 2 from hole 3’s pad. Hole 8 has a cool hanging basket. Hole 17 provides 2 tee options. Still dangerous on a few holes that cross others. A couple holes require backtracking and there are long walk ...
continue reading ›
-  +4 votes  + Curtis StimacDogmans Den › July 26, 2022
A-
Still a work In progress. Nice cement tee pads now on almost all holes. Paths are starting to get beat down and a lot of fairway grooming has been done. It is really turning into very nice course.
-  +4 votes  + Jeff Dunn CTDGDogmans Den › September 3, 2023
B+
This course is a ton of fun to play and rarely has much traffic and is a beautiful wooded scenery. Hidden gem. Some holes are unique and 17 and 18 are crazy tough for beginners. all par 3 and Mostly mid range and fairway drivers except for 17 and 18 those are long and tight. Some love to this course and it’s an A.
-  +3 votes  + Tony MaccarinoDogmans Den › May 15, 2018
B
I dont understand the complaints. The course is fairly short but it's very technical and still new. There was only 1 hole that the design itself is poor and it's that 90 degree left one thru the tunnel. Other that that, nice compliment course to have alongside the others. If you want distance or other things addison and seymour within 10 miles from here.
-  +3 votes  + Brendan LivingstonDogmans Den › July 26, 2022
A-
This place is really cool. If you can throw accurate shots to where you want to throw them then you'll shoot par. Also you'll have to make some big putts. Very technical. Last hole is a doozey.
-  +3 votes  + Diana StojkovicDogmans Den › March 12, 2023
B+
This is a very unique course. It is not easy. It still a work in progress, and has so much potential. But for how new it is, I think they did a great job.
-  +3 votes  + Keith FishDogmans Den › July 26, 2022
B+
-  +2 votes  + Becky CampbellDogmans Den › October 7, 2023
A-
I wish more people came to this park
-  +2 votes  + Darian OttDogmans Den › July 26, 2022
A
This course rocks for technical game! Fairly tricky shots, some daring lines you can take. As a player who is primarily backhand, I found myself throwing some forehands on holes I felt that called for it. Fairways are clear, recommend udisc to navigate so you don't take a wrong trail off though. Few holes have water OB, has a hanging basket, concrete pads, great scenery, and mostly short holes. Even hole 18 if you want a look at a birdie you have to play a semi technical shot all the way down to ...
continue reading ›
-  +1 votes  + Adam MitchellDogmans Den › July 26, 2022
B-
Nice place all in all. Not many obvious markers for next tee. Can get lost easily on the back nine. Keep an eye out for small, tan colored arrows pointing towards next tee or basket placement. Uses given property nicely, unfortunately there are some VERY long walks between holes and given the short hole layout makes for a long round. The long walks almost worked against the beautiful aesthetics of the property.
Nice tee signs, garbage cans spread out along with a few benches and a grill at hole 8.
Woodchip tee boxes. Short, tight wooded layout.
-  +1 votes  + Scottie ReslockDogmans Den › July 26, 2022
B-
I thought is was fun but I can see where a number of people would not like it. Not super long with only a couple holes over 300' Lots of technical holes. Tons of dog legs & "S" shaped shots. #10 in particular was super short but was an "L" shape making it kind of silly (still thought it was fun though). Overall worth checking out. It is still relatively new so it will get better over time. I can imagine in the spring it is super wet and have heard some reviews saying that it is. I played it in October and it was completely dry.
-  +1 votes  + Alex VillanuevaDogmans Den › July 26, 2022
C+
Played the course 2 times and I had mixed feelings. I like the land I like the scenery of the terrain but the course was alright. It has a lot of good holes I love the longer holes 17 and 18 are great championship level holes but the rest of the course ehh was a pitch and putt. There are a lot of good holes but too many high 200ft holes in a row could have done more with some of the land making longer and more championship level holes. From a casual view this is a good course a lot of duces and ...
continue reading ›
-  +1 votes  + Ben TaylorDogmans Den › July 26, 2022
B
Very aesthetically pleasing course, short but challenging holes with tough fairway lines. Holes 2 & 3 are a little awkward with parallel fairways both throwing the same direction, my hope/assumption is this is why they didn't pour a teepad on 2. Good signage, simple but accurate hole signs w/distance. Definitely room to improve, but overall a good course worth throwing.
-  +1 votes  + Will GoeringerDogmans Den › July 26, 2022
B-
Challenging course. Holes are short but have tight, curving lines and thick foliage so it's difficult to get to the basket on your drive on some holes. Terrain is rough, but the course was just installed so I assume it will get better with time (this includes the wood chip tee pads). Needs better signage to the next hole, especially on the back 9. Got lost 3 times in one round. I'm interested to see how this course will evolve.
-  +1 votes  + Henry TheodoroffDogmans Den › September 3, 2016
B
Cool course, needs to be broken in more for better line and risk reward. Signage is ok but can become confusing at times.
-  +1 votes  + Jeff MillerDogmans Den › July 26, 2022
C+
Some cool holes. Could have been laid out better. Too much back tracking. WATCH OUT FOR BEES hole 11 on left we got hit hard ground bees. Did not hate it will go back.
-  +1 votes  + Garett PatriaDogmans Den › June 14, 2020
A-
Would be perfect if it had better signage. Really cool design. Gorgeous! Got lost in the woods trying to find Pad #16. Pad #2 has no signage at all and just a dirt pad (had to ask folks where #2 even was).
-  +1 votes  + Thomas ZammitDogmans Den › July 26, 2022
B-
Very muddy and wet at this time of year. There is variety to the course but it goes a bit to the extreme on some holes. Right now in December, the disc can cut through the random 90 degree turns but not so much in the summer. The poor holes were almost exclusively on the back nine, specifically 17, can't remember the others. Others have an obnoxiously low ceiling like holes 8 (hanging basket hole) and 10 (90 degree left turn). Those might be fine however I could not skip shot in the snow. ...
continue reading ›
-  +0 votes  + David TomlinsonDogmans Den › July 26, 2022
A-
pretty nice layout. A little short and the lines are tight but it forces you to think snd throw different throws. Its a little ruff but it should beat in in time. Good signs and garbage cans.
-  +0 votes  + Paul DISC-OR-DIE HolsteinDogmans Den › July 26, 2022
A-
Miles Lawrence and crew did a fantastic job here! I'm not measuring this course against Flip and Whiskey, but against new courses that have just opened and this one is right up there. Hanging basket, arrows to the next holes all over the place, tons of bridges, wood chips as pads, it's pretty amazing. Mostly wooded, plenty of short holes but not always with easy lines, solid chainstar baskets all around, elevated baskets in a few places and even some stone pilings like you'd find at Flip a ...
continue reading ›
-  +0 votes  + Jon LonderDogmans Den › February 16, 2023
B
-  +0 votes  + Jeff HollingerDogmans Den › July 26, 2022
D
Woof.
-  +0 votes  + Tim MisiakDogmans Den › February 26, 2017
B-
I played here last weekend and thought it was a fun and challenging course. Some of the holes are far from your traditional layout but that was one of the things I liked. A couple fairways take a 90 degree turn (literally) causing you to focus heavily on shot placement. I'm sure it gets a lot harder in the spring and summer when there is plant growth. I'll definitely be back to play this course.
-  +0 votes  + Jeff DoranDogmans Den › October 17, 2022
B
Review as of 5-1-20: Pretty muddy In spots and the bugs were bad. I really enjoyed the majority of this course. You are forced to shape shots and hit lines or the rough will punish you. There were, however, a few nonsensical hole layouts on the back nine that make me question the knowledge and competency of the course designer. All in all, an enjoyable experience unless all you care about are throwing bombs.
-  -1 votes  + Tim SylvainDogmans Den › July 26, 2022
D+
Could have been so much better, poor design. Played it again, just to make sure...I'm sure now, not a great course.
-  -1 votes  + Chris ArnettDogmans Den › July 26, 2022
C+
-  -1 votes  + Ryan PaduchDogmans Den › July 26, 2022
A+
-  -1 votes  + Stephen FarkasDogmans Den › December 8, 2017
D
-  -2 votes  + Timm KoppenDogmans Den › July 26, 2022
B
-  -2 votes  + Nick OliverDogmans Den › September 8, 2016
C+
I had the pleasure of playing the course with its designer and had not only the experience of shooting the course but also insight as to what was done and why. The quick version - I gave it a C+ based on tricky navigation in spots, its raw quality, and some areas that need to be opened up for a more friendly course experience. I could go B- but its not quite there yet and I only played it once. It is likely the most unique course shot-wise outside of Flip. Pretty short distances overall, but ...
continue reading ›
-  -2 votes  + John "christmas" WintersDogmans Den › October 7, 2023
D
Had potential but as of now i dislike it. Too many layup holes it gets boring
-  -2 votes  + Chris TrumbullDogmans Den › March 4, 2017
C-
very wet (frozen) every where I went. probably better in a different season. over all a very good coarse. willow and cass = this.
-  -2 votes  + Trevor DiehlDogmans Den › July 26, 2022
D+
With the amount of land this course has, it could be so much better. First few holes are pretty decent with some nice lines, but the last 10 holes or so are just terrible. Super wooded, really buggy, and incredibly hard to play even for veteran disc golfers. Not a course for the faint of heart.
-  -3 votes  + Shrimp Boat CaptainDogmans Den › May 26, 2023
D-
-  -3 votes  + Willy LangeDogmans Den › September 6, 2016
B
-  -3 votes  + Bart KowalewskiDogmans Den › September 6, 2016
D
For what land is given, the course could have been designed MUCH better.Some walks between holes are longer than the holes themselves. Some holes have lines that are not practical. Pros will not have fun here. Its a casual course. Too bad there couldnt have been more input on the course design.
-  -4 votes  + Brandon NealDogmans Den › July 1, 2022
A
-  -4 votes  + Skyler StokerDogmans Den › May 5, 2021
D
First I want to say that if you are the designer of this course please don't take this personal... Getting out of the car we had no idea which way to go. There is a small white sign that says "disc golf course" on a chain link fence but it is barely visible from the parking lot. Ok not a big deal. Tee pads are wood chips but it's a new course so okay. Holes 1-3 were decent holes by themselves until you look at them together. The pads for 2 and 3 are 60-70' apart and facing in the same general ...
continue reading ›
-  -5 votes  + Bill RichardsDogmans Den › September 7, 2016
D
Played it yesterday morning and I completely agree 100% with Skyler's review of the course. Besides being a terribly dangerous course, especially on 2-3 and also where the trail between 15 and 16 comes out right into the driving lane of 16, blindly, there are some lines and angles that made me say what the heck is this? When you have to walk further inbetween holes than what the holes actually play, I feel that the use of the land wasn't good. But, on the other hand, the designer may have only b ...
continue reading ›
We use cookies to improve user experience.