Dacey Fields

Franklin, Massachusetts     1 course · 18 holes     Driving directions

Course reviews

Log In or Sign Up to review this course.
Most votes   |   Newest first   |   Oldest first
-  +0 votes  + Shai Simonson › June 11, 2017
Very nice course, Great signage. Good layout. Nice mix of left and right. try mild elevation but good use of terrain. Some fairways are poorly designed -- making the hole somewhat arbitrary, with no real consistent route. Otherwise well maintained and well designed course.
-  +0 votes  + mike Dussault › April 30, 2017
Course has recently got a resurgence in local interest. New club is doing an excellent job injecting new life into this project. Challenging lines that test your whole game.
-  +0 votes  + Kyle MacRae › April 6, 2017
Challenges the definition of "fairway" in a few places, but the course has come a long way in the last few years. Many holes have a steep learning curve. For your first trip here, leave your drivers in the car and play "position" golf with midranges. It's a technical course that rewards precision over power.
-  +0 votes  + Mike "Bear Pawz" Gaffney › March 26, 2017
-  +0 votes  + Kyle E › April 25, 2016
This is my home course and overall i think it is fantastic, but challenging due to the density of the forest. Good length holes with varried dog legs and elevation changes. Most of the tee boxes are manmade rubber. Course can get super frustrating after hitting tree after tree. Great for sharpshooters
-  +1 votes  + John J › April 17, 2016
I have mixed feelings about Dacey. I love it as a less crowded alternative to Borderland, and it's certainly challenging. My issue is that it warrants the par 4 on many holes simply by creating tiny lanes with a multitude of trees. Be prepared to hit trees. The hole design is flat out ridiculous on some holes. Also, there are many small hidden tree stumps I have tripped over. Be aware when walking.
-  +1 votes  + Eric Kevorkian › March 23, 2016
-  -1 votes  + Raivis Markons- Craig › December 21, 2015
-  -1 votes  + bobby joseph › November 6, 2015
-  -1 votes  + Scott Laman › October 14, 2015
Course has nice trails and walkways between some holes. Some holes were confusing to get to. Overall pretty good course. T-Pads are currently being worked on. That will be big improvement.
-  -1 votes  + Bill Bertera › July 21, 2015
The 2 layouts they have now are a good compliment (white & blue). White is pretty short, and blue is hard but mostly fair. Needs actual tees though, I imagine it gets wet & buggy when it rains.
-  -1 votes  + John Rogers › May 18, 2015
-  -1 votes  + Dan Coburn › May 10, 2015
This was a beautiful course that I highly enjoyed playing
-  +0 votes  + Marc Sobota › August 22, 2015
A good course in its current state. Several tees are still dirt, and some have roots and rocks to trip over and it still needs some tlc along the fairways. But this course will be a gem when it's finished.
-  +0 votes  + Dennis MacCallum › September 12, 2014
Needs a lot of work. A challenge is always fun, but so is a playable course. Front nine were not very fun. Back nine were actually pretty decent. This course has huge potential. I like the good hike from this course. Signage needs to be revamped. I like the new tee pads going in. They were awesome. So of the best I've come across. Keep up the good work out here and you'll have yourselves a top course.
-  -1 votes  + Josh Herweck › June 4, 2014
-  -1 votes  + John Giampapa › May 2, 2016
-  +1 votes  + Chris Durkee › September 8, 2013
I spent the time to get the pictures of this course and load them because they weren't available. I stopped to play this course on the way home, so I am not local to this course. I don't want to be too brutal here but this course is still in the works. This course has potential to be a really fun course. There are areas of the course that are very rocky so footing can be an issue. The front nine are not as enjoyable as the back 9. The front nine contains a lot of trees and would require some str ...
continue reading ›
-  +1 votes  + David C › October 21, 2013
-  +1 votes  + Mike Murphy › May 12, 2016