Town Park (Amesbury Pines)

Amesbury, Massachusetts     1 course · 18 holes     Driving directions

Course reviews

Sign In or Sign Up to review this course.
Most votes   |   Newest first   |   Oldest first
-  +1 votes  + Shai Simonson › October 26, 2014
B-
It's a tightly packed course with some nice variety of elevation and left and right. Some baskets are very old and beat up. Hole 18 is a pretty birdie option across a pond.
-  +1 votes  + Steven Marcil › September 25, 2010
B+
-  +1 votes  + Marc Duci › August 14, 2011
B-
Not a bad course. Good job with designing on a very limited area of land. A mixture of wooded and open holes. Didn't like that a few holes cross over each other. Average hole lengths. I would play here again.
-  +1 votes  + spectralmonkey 11 › October 11, 2014
B
For what and where it is, i think this course is a fun spot. Progress is being made on the tees, and replacing the old old baskets with newer. Signage could be improved, and once all the tees and baskets are in i would give it an A-. yes navigation can be tricky the first time, but once you play through once you should remember how it goes. first 8 holes are a bit crowded in the woods yes. ive never seen it busy during the week.
-  +1 votes  + Ned Eisenberg › February 5, 2013
B-
I really liked the course but it was empty when we played there. I can see it being a really big hassle and pretty dangerous if the course was crowded.
-  +1 votes  + Bill Currier › May 10, 2014
A-
-  +1 votes  + Tim Allen › September 14, 2014
B+
A fun course with big pine trees, 2 ponds in play on 5 of the hole on the back 9. Tight layout in some areas with sometimes crossing other hole in play. Some foot traffic from the park and nearby school can slow the round sometimes. With the new brick tees coming in and the possibility of new baskets this course is shaping up well.
-  +1 votes  + Alexander MacLean › September 25, 2015
B+
Really nice T pads some fairways cross and can be dangerous but great course in that park really nice
-  +0 votes  + Paul Fleming › May 8, 2011
B+
-  +0 votes  + Ira Divoll › July 10, 2011
C-
Nice course to have in the middle of town - tee boxes hold it back a bit.
-  +0 votes  + shane mitchell › September 25, 2010
A-
-  +0 votes  + Mike Davis › April 17, 2011
B
-  +0 votes  + Erica Johnson › May 9, 2012
B
I really liked the holes individually. but the overall navigation/course layout is a bit awkward.
-  +0 votes  + Matt Stillwagon › January 22, 2012
B-
-  +0 votes  + Jaxon Sheehy › May 1, 2011
B-
i like this course a lot- the tee pads are a tad rough and could use some sort of fly pads or cement IMO. good variety in terms of woods and open and water and left to right. it doesn't get nearly as windy as Pye Brook. If you play from 1 to 18, the last three holes are great chances for birdies- and can be a real morale booster as you leave! if you're a local to the area, this course is a must- if you're traveling, you might want to play Pye Brook in the same day to make a day out of it.
-  +0 votes  + Andrew Ross › June 28, 2012
C-
-  +0 votes  + Bill Bertera › July 5, 2011
B-
-  +0 votes  + John Mclaughlin › March 24, 2012
C+
Fun course, a bit of verything, not marke very well and some baskets are old other than that good fun
-  +0 votes  + Brian Dunigan › June 11, 2012
B
The course lay out is a really good challenge and is fun to play. The only thing that brings this course down is that some of the baskets are old and make it very hard to make putts (single ring of chains no inner chains and they don't slide to grab the disk). The t-boxes are mostly gravel and uneven. It is a good course for being part of a town park. Go play it :)
-  +0 votes  + Marc F › June 28, 2012
B-
-  +0 votes  + Justin Peterson › September 6, 2012
B+
great course with a great layout...only issue I have are a few of the baskets need updating.
-  +0 votes  + Brian Gewirtz › September 16, 2012
B+
The course is in a nice location, wooded, but without any heavy brush. The tee boxes are mostly sand, dirt or gravel, which along with a couple older baskets are the only downsides of this course. The holes are interesting with a number of blind shots over hills or around trees. I have to say that the course is very fun with a couple shots over the lake. See you out there.
-  +0 votes  + Todd H › May 17, 2013
C+
Played here 16 MAY 2013. Tee boxes are pretty rough, they are dirt or gravel with occasionally deep ruts. The tee markers have photos of the hole, with the preferred line to the basket. A nice touch, but half of them are missing. This course is very challenging for beginners, with tons of trees, and narrow fairways. The layout can be a bit confusing, but there are usually markers to show you the way. I only got lost briefly a time or two. If you do go off the fairway, watch out for the poison ...
continue reading ›
-  +0 votes  + Kevin Lydon › April 23, 2016
C+
-  +0 votes  + Will Cox › August 30, 2013
B-
Broken tee signs made it a bit confusing but fun quick playing course
-  +0 votes  + Carlos del Castillo › August 17, 2014
A-
I really liked this course. I think it's better than Pye Brook, but the holes are hard to see. Some of the holes don't have maps to say where the holes are, but it is still a great course.
-  +0 votes  + James MacRae › March 20, 2017
A+
all new paver tee pads and new double chain baskets make this course play much better than it used to. I recommend checking it out again if you havent been in a while
-  +0 votes  + Josh Verity › September 15, 2014
B
-  +0 votes  + Paul The Frisbee Guy › November 8, 2014
B-
Overall conditions were 'par'. I was very confused on hole 10 when I had a solid drive, but it was only until I was on my approach that I noticed someone sawed off and stole hole 10. That wasn't even the worse part of the day. On hole 17a I rolled down the cliff and fell into the water...TWICE!

Overall decent course. Too many slippery pine needles.
-  +0 votes  + Justin Kent › August 27, 2015
B+
-  +0 votes  + David Martin › September 21, 2016
C
-  +0 votes  + Joshua DaSilva › February 11, 2019
B-
Solid course, fair fairways, variety of shots, and a alternate layout during the winter.
The course is a bit tight so be aware of other disc golfers.
Also be aware of pedestrians especially in the summer.
-  +0 votes  + Zachary Stough › October 11, 2017
A-
-  +0 votes  + Dan B › December 28, 2017
B-
Short course played mostly under tree cover (very tall conifers). Almost no undergrowth. Several holes are out in the fields, with two played over small ponds. I believe it was designed by a LHBH thrower, so that's what it plays to primarily. Not a ton of shot variety but is fun. This is the easiest course on the North Shore to score well on.

Has a winter layout where 8 through 13 are varied with the option of playing alternates on 15 to 17 (highly recommended). The winter layout is far superior to the summer layout, so if you are making a trip do it ~November to March.
-  +0 votes  + Kevin Cozzi › August 9, 2018
B+
better with the pads than the last time I played it (2009'ish); compact, but a nice variety of shots: some long, some tight because of trees, but not excessively so, some over water; competing with other park users can be problematic
-  -1 votes  + Josh bunker › November 30, 2013
F-
the pins are missing on at least 2 holes the layout is ok but almost all the holes overlap and its difficult to navigate on top of you cant see where they are this course is awful in my opinion
-  -1 votes  + brian Hagan jr › February 17, 2014
D-
I hated this course. When I played it was hard to follow where the holes were, most of the tee markers were destroyed and after 13 we couldn't even find 14, and we had a course map. Overall it could have been better with its aesthetics. But the holes we could get through definitely could have been awesome, if there was a hole overveiw at the tee to tell what was out of bounds or mandatory, or even where the pin was in congruence to the tee it'd be a go to spot.
We use cookies to improve user experience.