Boettler Park

Green, Ohio     1 course · 9 holes     Driving directions

Course reviews

Log In or Sign Up to review this course.
Most votes   |   Newest first   |   Oldest first
-  +2 votes  + Ryan Lepley › November 1, 2010
The only reason I didn't fail this course is because it has beautiful disc catcher baskets. Lets see where did this go wrong... Lets start out by saying that none of the distances on the tee signs are correct. Some are off by better than100 feet. The pictures on the signs don't really resemble the course layout. I don't like playing this course 2/3 of the year because of the surrounding vegetation. Most (not all) fairways are 15 - 20 ft wide with waist high grass on both sides. If you miss these ...
continue reading ›
-  +2 votes  + Matt Dungan › November 23, 2010
course is playable now that the vegitation is dying off, and i have noticed some improvements, on hole 3 they have removed the brush between the tee and basket and they fixed the drainage ditch so you dont have to walk back up 2s fairway to get to the basket. I play here because it's 5 min from my house which is helpful now that it gets dark so early. it's a nice park and has nice baskets and some of the holes are challenging.
-  +2 votes  + Dave D › May 29, 2011
Probably a nice course in early spring. Once the grass starts to grow, you spend more time looking for your discs than you do playing.
-  +1 votes  + Cory King › October 20, 2010
Only played once in the summer time. The 1st 3 holes are decent, but after that it's terrible. The remaining holes consist of a 15' wide mowed strip of fairway surrounded by waist high brush on both sides. Spent more time looking for discs than playing, did not finish the round.
-  +1 votes  + eric wernet › October 26, 2010
Average park. In the spring the fairways were mowed, it wasn't a challenge to find plastic. Maybe a local player could address this with the parks people for a little more TLC. You will have to bring your shots here though. It plays like links type ball golf, not a lot of trees but accuracy is rewarded.
-  +1 votes  + Mitchell Sintic › April 28, 2012
-  +1 votes  + Chip Flounders › July 19, 2012
The tee pads are 3feet long, the rough is up to my waste, there are only nine holes, and none of the signs for the holes even come close to discribing the holes. We're talking about 100ft off on distances. What a waste of good baskets. I guess its worth playing if you play portage lakes too or live 5 mins away.
-  +0 votes  + Vic S › January 29, 2013
Distance off on most tee's pads, I took new measurement twice on each run. Posted on here.
-  +0 votes  + james moose graham › October 26, 2010
-  +0 votes  + Dan Hill › February 8, 2011
-  +0 votes  + Nolan Klein › June 3, 2011
Where to start... first hole is an impossible dog leg to the right. All of the tees were only about 2 feet to short, couldn't really get a good start. The distances on all the holes were way off (doesn't take a masters degree to measure distance). Several times I had to wander off into thick brush looking for my disc which could of been by my feet and I wouldn't of known it. The maps don't show the correct way to the basket. Hopefully you can throw between a 10' row of trees or else you won't ma ...
continue reading ›
-  +0 votes  + Don Mullinax › August 23, 2011
What hsn't been said below ?
-  +0 votes  + Clay Domenico › March 25, 2012
Ok, Lets be honest, this course is really bad... Hole 1 starts off with a crazy right... making it almost impossible. Hole 2 + 3 arnt too bad, then after that its down hill (and not in elevation.) the rest is a large flat field with alot off annoying trees and grass and bushes (unplayable once it grows up.) the holes are scattered about this area. And to make it worse, the tees are super small, and the distances and illustrations on the signs are NOT accurate at all, making the pars in accurate too. Overall i recommend only using this course to practice putts..
-  +0 votes  + nathaniel b › June 15, 2012
only played 9 because of how much i disliked the course
-  +0 votes  + Greg Platt › June 17, 2012
-  +0 votes  + Matt O › June 22, 2012
This course is probably really cool for people who can only throw about 100 feet or so. Not a surprise that I didn't see anyone else playing. At least my daughter had fun at the playground. That's why I rated it an F+ instead of an F.
-  +0 votes  + Matt Hill › July 28, 2012
-  +0 votes  + jeff gayhart › August 31, 2012
This course could be good with the amount of land available but as is it sucks. The more you get into the middle of summer the more veg. you have to deal with just like at schnieder park. They need to get some disc golfers in that know what there doing and redo this course so it can be that awesome 9 you actually wanna play. If not for the knee high weeds and grass the flies were terrible this year and I think if everything was mowed it would help with that and seeing as how we were in a drought ...
continue reading ›
-  +0 votes  + Dominic G › November 23, 2012
Horrible. The baskets should be put to better use somewhere else. I try to appreciate the effort that is put in when a course is laid but its hard to give it a better rating. The layout is hard to follow. The fairways lead nowhere. I was always just throwing over the rough to get to the basket. The rough is ROUGH (it was dying and was still a bear). The park itself is beautiful and one of the best around. I have more fun just throwing in a field than playing this course.
-  +0 votes  + Anthony Tomin › May 10, 2013
-  +0 votes  + denny c › December 14, 2013
Under rated course. Beautiful location.
-  +0 votes  + Bill Palmer › January 23, 2014
Just no